About Andrew

Andrew Keith is a litigation special counsel in the patent counseling & prosecution practice. He specializes in the areas of patent preparation and prosecution, particularly in the biotech, and pharmaceutical fields. Specifically, he has experience in patent preparation and prosecution of pharmaceutical formulations, small molecules and biomolecule therapeutics. He also has experience in matters involving patent litigation and drafting noninfringement, infringement, invalidity and patentability opinions.

View full bio

Experience

    Innate Pharma - $79 Million IPO

    October 24, 2019

    Cooley advised Innate Pharma S.A. on its $79.1 million global offering of 14,375,000 ordinary shares, including the full exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares. Innate, whose securities now trade on Euronext Paris and Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “IPH," is a French biotechnology company focused on discovering, developing and commercializing first-in-class therapeutic antibodies designed to harness the immune system for the treatment of oncology indications with significant unmet medical need. Partners Richard Segal, Yvan-Claude Pierre and Divakar Gupta led the Cooley team.

    Related contacts

    Richard Segal
    Partner, New York
    Yvan-Claude Pierre
    Partner, New York
    Div Gupta
    Partner, New York
    Brandon W. Fenn
    Partner, New York
    Katie Kazem
    Partner, Reston
    David Dalton
    Associate, Santa Monica
    Aaron Pomeroy
    Partner, Colorado
    Darren DeStefano
    Partner, Reston
    Geoffrey Spolyar
    Partner, Boston
    Natasha Leskovsek
    Of Counsel, Washington, DC
    Phil Mitchell
    Partner, New York
    Andrew Keith
    Special Counsel, Washington, DC
    Daniel I. Goldberg
    Partner, New York

    Related Practices & Industries

    Global cross-license achieved for Gevo in long-running biofuels patent case

    August 27, 2015

    Few patent cases make it all the way to the Supreme Court. Even fewer involve a dispute in which a company's very survival is at stake. Since 2011, our client Gevo, a pioneer in the biofuels industry, and Butamax, a joint venture of giants BP and DuPont, had been trading blows, filing close to a dozen patent suits against each other. Butamax initially brought suit in the District of Delaware in an attempt to knock Gevo out of the emerging market for isobutanol alternative energy. In that case, the court granted summary judgment of noninfringement in favor of Gevo, prompting Butamax to appeal. On appeal, the Federal Circuit rejected the district court's claim construction and issued a new claim construction that vacated the noninfringement ruling.

    In response, Cooley took the case to the US Supreme Court and, in January 2015, the high court granted our petition for writ of certiorari, vacating the judgment against Gevo and remanding the case back to the Federal Circuit for further consideration. This decision, and numerous other victories including key summary judgment victories, paved the path for Gevo to reach a favorable global patent cross-license and settlement agreement with Butamax. The agreement forms a partnership between the two biofuel companies aimed at leveraging one another's technology.

    Related contacts

    Dr. Michelle Rhyu
    Senior Counsel, Palo Alto
    Stephen Neal
    Chairman Emeritus, Palo Alto
    Dr. Bonnie Weiss McLeod
    Of Counsel, Washington, DC
    Daniel Knauss
    Partner, Palo Alto
    Adam Pivovar
    Partner, Washington, DC
    Andrew Keith
    Special Counsel, Washington, DC

    Related Practices & Industries

    AcelRx Pharmaceuticals in Public Offering

    July 25, 2013

    Palo Alto, Calif. – Cooley represented AcelRx Pharmaceuticals. in its public offering of approximately 4.8 million shares of common stock. AcelRx is a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of innovative therapies for the treatment of acute and breakthrough pain.

    The offering closed on July 23, 2013.

    Cooley represented AcelRx in its initial public offering in February 2011.

    Related contacts

    Mark Weeks
    Partner, Palo Alto
    Chadwick Mills
    Partner, San Francisco
    Marina Remennik
    Special Counsel, Palo Alto
    Natasha Leskovsek
    Of Counsel, Washington, DC
    Mark Windfeld-Hansen
    Senior Counsel, Palo Alto
    Scott Talbot
    Senior Counsel, Reston
    Andrew Keith
    Special Counsel, Washington, DC

    Pretrial Win for Gevo in Patent Suit

    March 27, 2013

    Palo Alto, Calif. – Cooley achieved a major victory when it secured a judgment of no infringement on behalf of leading renewable chemicals and advanced biofuels client Gevo in a patent suit brought by Butamax Advanced Biofuels, a joint venture between BP and DuPont.

    On March 19, 2013, a Delaware federal judge issued a favorable claim construction ruling for Gevo, granting Gevo partial summary judgment of no infringement under the doctrine of equivalents, and ruling that two key claims of the Butamax patents were invalid. Although the Court did not grant summary judgment of no literal infringement, Butamax acknowledged that it could not prove literal infringement under the court's claim construction and agreed to stipulate to a judgment of no literal infringement.

    In January 2011, Butamax filed a patent infringement suit against Gevo asserting two patents relating to the production of isobutanol, a four-carbon alcohol, in microorganisms. Gevo produces its isobutanol using proprietary recombinant yeast that is genetically engineered to produce it at a high yield. In June 2012, the court denied Butamax's request for a preliminary injunction against Gevo, a decision that was upheld by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in December 2012. A trial date was set for early April 2013.

    "This judgment marks yet another great step forward for Gevo," said Jim Brogan, partner and chair of the intellectual property group."The ruling enables this highly innovative company to continue to focus on its growth and the development of innovative biofuels products."

    A separate patent re-examination team has obtained rejections of all challenged claims of the two asserted Butamax patents from the US Patent and Trademark Office.

    Related contacts

    Matthew Brigham
    Of Counsel, Palo Alto
    Andrew Keith
    Special Counsel, Washington, DC
    Daniel Knauss
    Partner, Palo Alto
    Dr. Bonnie Weiss McLeod
    Of Counsel, Washington, DC
    Stephen Neal
    Chairman Emeritus, Palo Alto
    Adam Pivovar
    Partner, Washington, DC
    Dr. Michelle Rhyu
    Senior Counsel, Palo Alto

Admissions and credentials

  • District of Columbia
  • Registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
  • Texas
  • Virginia

This content is provided for general informational purposes only, and your access or use of the content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you or your organization and Cooley LLP, Cooley (UK) LLP, or any other affiliated practice or entity (collectively referred to as "Cooley"). By accessing this content, you agree that the information provided does not constitute legal or other professional advice. This content is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction, and you should not act or refrain from acting based on this content. This content may be changed without notice. It is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up to date, and it may not reflect the most current legal developments. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Do not send any confidential information to Cooley, as we do not have any duty to keep any information you provide to us confidential. When advising companies, our attorney-client relationship is with the company, not with any individual. This content may have been generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence (Al) in accordance with our Al Principles, may be considered Attorney Advertising and is subject to our legal notices.