For more than two decades, my trial practice has focused on high-stakes, fast-paced commercial disputes involving technologies central to many of the world's most popular consumer products.

Experience

Cooley Secures Favorable Decision for VideaHealth in Lawsuit Filed by Overjet

July 26, 2024

Cooley secured a favorable decision for VideaHealth in a lawsuit brought by Overjet, one of VideaHealth’s competitors in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) solutions for dental services organizations and practitioners. 

In February 2024, Overjet filed a lawsuit in the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts against VideaHealth in which it alleged trademark, copyright and patent infringement, as well as false advertising under the federal Lanham Act and Massachusetts state law. Specifically, Overjet alleged that:

  • VideaHealth infringed Overjet’s purported rights to the registered mark DENTAL ASSIST.
  • VideaHealth’s use of various colors and shapes in its radiograph overlaps infringes Overjet’s nonliteral elements of its software copyrights.
  • VideaHealth’s AI offering infringes Overjet’s patents. 

Overjet also moved for a preliminary injunction. In July 2024, Judge Allison D. Burroughs issued a 31-page order denying Overjet’s preliminary injunction motion on all claims – namely, copyright infringement, trademark infringement, false advertising and unfair competition. She held that “Overjet has failed to demonstrate that the color, shape, and shades used in its Visualization Tool are copyrightable, that Videa has made materially false and misleading statements when advertising its products, or that it is likely to suffer irreparable harm.”

This is a significant win for VideaHealth against one of its top competitors in the dental AI space.

Related contacts

Brendan Hughes
Partner, Washington, DC
Stephen Smith
Partner, Washington, DC
Judd Lauter
Special Counsel, San Francisco
Kayla Blaker
Associate, Washington, DC

Related Practices & Industries

Cooley Obtains Summary Judgment for Qualcomm in Patent Infringement Lawsuit

April 5, 2022

Cooley achieved a significant victory for longtime client Qualcomm when US District Judge Paul G. Byron of the US District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted the firm’s motion for summary judgment in a contested patent infringement lawsuit, ParkerVision v. Qualcomm. Lawyers Stephen Smith, Matthew Brigham, Eamonn Gardner, Dena Chen, Jeffrey Karr, Priya Viswanath and Benjamin Lin led the Cooley team advising Qualcomm. Brigham and Gardner argued the motion for summary judgment, with assistance from the larger team.

Read more

Related contacts

Stephen Smith
Partner, Washington, DC
Matthew Brigham
Of Counsel, Palo Alto
Eamonn Gardner
Partner, Colorado
Dena Chen
Partner, Palo Alto
Jeffrey Karr
Of Counsel, Palo Alto
Priya B. Viswanath
Special Counsel, Palo Alto
Stephen Neal
Chairman Emeritus, Palo Alto
Kathleen Goodhart
Partner, San Francisco
Erin Trenda
Partner, San Diego
Rich Nieva
Senior Paralegal, Palo Alto
Cassandra Reed
Paralegal Specialist, Palo Alto

Related Practices & Industries

Andreessen Horowitz, General Catalyst + IVP Lead Hopin’s $400 Million Series C

March 19, 2021

Cooley advised Andreessen Horowitz, General Catalyst and Institutional Venture Partners on co-leading Hopin’s $400 million Series C funding round, which also included participation from returning investors Coatue, DFJ Growth, Northzone, Salesforce Ventures and Tiger Global. Hopin, a leading virtual events provider, will use the capital to accelerate growth, including by scaling its operations, team and platform to meet the demands of its expanding customer base and support its multi-product business. Cooley partner Ryan Naftulin led the team advising the trio of lead investors.

Read more

Related contacts

Ryan Naftulin
Partner, London
Eric Davison
Associate, London
Aaron Archer
Partner, London
Megan Browdie
Partner, Washington, DC
Chris Coulter
Partner, London
Jack Jones
Associate, London
Natasha Kaye
Partner, London
Christopher Kimball
Partner, Washington, DC
Xander Lee
Partner, Santa Monica
Stephen Smith
Partner, Washington, DC
Peter H. Werner
Partner in Charge – San Francisco, San Francisco

Related Practices & Industries

Neptune Technologies and Bioressources’ patent is protected from attack

May 16, 2017

Cooley represented Neptune in multiparty patent infringement actions regarding its krill oil containing omega-3 phospholipid product against several manufacturers and distributors of competing krill oil.

Cooley previously filed a Section 337 complaint at the International Trade Commission against several competitors, resulting in all of Neptune's closest competitors entering into licensing agreements for patents relating to its fish krill oil.

In a parallel IPR proceeding filed against Neptune by Aker BioMarine, the largest krill oil producer in the world, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a decision that two select krill oil patent claims are valid. As a result of this ruling, our client is positioned to secure royalties.

Related contacts

Jon Graves
Senior Counsel, Reston
Stephen Smith
Partner, Washington, DC
DeAnna Allen
Partner, Washington, DC

Related Practices & Industries

Admissions and credentials

District of Columbia

Massachusetts

Rhode Island

Virginia

Rankings and accolades

BTI Consulting Group: Client Service All-Star

IAM Patent 1000: Top Patent Lawyer

Legal 500: Patent Litigation; Trade Secrets (Litigation & Non-Contentious Matters)

Managing Intellectual Property: DC Metro Litigator of the Year Finalist

Managing Intellectual Property: IP Star

Memberships and affiliations

International Trade Commission Trial Lawyers Association

Litigation Department of the Year: IP Finalist

The American Lawyer