NAM Petitions SEC to Stay Conflict Minerals Rule

By Cydney Posner

The National Association of Manufacturers, Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable have petitioned the SEC to stay the conflict minerals rule or the Form SD filing deadline pending amendment of the final rule's disclosure requirements. Action was requested by tomorrow so that, if the petition is denied, the petitioners may seek relief in court. They argue that, without the language that has been ruled unconstitutional by the D.C. Circuit, the remainder of the rule has questionable benefits. In addition, they contend, there are many open issues, such as the extent of the SEC's "discretion to craft a disclosure that comports with both the statute and the First Amendment," including whether the existing disclosure requirement is compelled by the statute and, if so, whether that requirement is severable. If not compelled, the petitioners argue, the SEC will have to devise replacement language and consider the costs and benefits, none of which appears doable in remaining one-month timeframe.

Given the statement by the director of Corp Fin yesterday (which seems unlikely to have been issued without the concurrence of the majority of commissioners), a betting person might put his or her money on the petitioners' having to seek relief from the court.

This content is provided for general informational purposes only, and your access or use of the content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you or your organization and Cooley LLP, Cooley (UK) LLP, or any other affiliated practice or entity (collectively referred to as “Cooley”). By accessing this content, you agree that the information provided does not constitute legal or other professional advice. This content is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction and you should not act or refrain from acting based on this content. This content may be changed without notice. It is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up to date, and it may not reflect the most current legal developments. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Do not send any confidential information to Cooley, as we do not have any duty to keep any information you provide to us confidential. This content may be considered Attorney Advertising and is subject to our legal notices.