2022 – 2023 US Corporate Governance Survey: Part 3 Results
Cooley is committed to providing public companies and their boards with relevant, on-demand resources. As a part of that effort, we are excited to be conducting a multipart survey series designed to provide insights and best practices on key corporate governance topics, practices and market trends.
Here are the results and key takeaways from Part 3 of the survey series, which focused on policies and procedures related to hedging and pledging of company securities.
Hedging and pledging
Addressed in policies
The vast majority of company respondents address hedging and pledging of company securities in their insider trading policy or a separate policy. Notably, the companies with policies that address hedging only – or do not address hedging or pledging – have less than five years of maturity as a public company and a market cap below $500 million.
Hedging coverage
Prohibitions for all employees and directors
Almost three-quarters of company respondents prohibit hedging of company shares for all employees and directors.
Hedging policies covering company securities
The hedging policies of nearly all company respondents cover all company securities, regardless of how they were acquired.
Prohibiting hedging of company securities
Company respondents were largely aligned in never permitting hedging of company securities.
Pledging coverage
Variation among companies
There was more variation in the coverage of the pledging policies among company respondents. While more than half of respondents flatly prohibit pledging for all employees and directors, 18% permit pledges for a specified group of employees and/or directors, with the remainder generally prohibiting pledging for a subset of people. Notably, less than a third of technology companies indicated that they prohibit pledging for all employees and directors.
Permitting pledging of securities
While most company respondents never permit pledging, a minority of companies permit pledging if the pledge is precleared or if specified enumerated criteria are met. Responses indicated that these criteria are typically related to limiting the pledging to a specified percentage of holdings, the pledgor’s financial wherewithal, the presence of alternate collateral and the status of the lender.
Margin accounts
Holding company shares
More than three-quarters of company respondents never permit people to hold company shares in a margin account.
Prohibition by role
A significant majority of company respondents prohibit at least some people from holding company shares in a margin account, with the prohibition most commonly applying for all employees and directors.
Survey Part 4 – Environmental, Social and Governance
Cooley’s multipart survey series is designed to provide public companies with insights and best practices on key corporate governance topics, practices and market trends.
We invite you to participate in Part 4 of the survey, which focuses on your company's environmental, social and governance policies. Your responses will remain completely anonymous, and this part of the survey will take no more than five minutes to complete.